Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Reason #451,000 to Heart Joss Whedon

Joss Whedon, the wonderful mind behind perhaps the greatest television series in history with Buffy, the Vampire Slayer, the Academy Award nominated co-screenwriter of the first Toy Story finally hit it huge last year for writing and directing Marvel's The Avengers.  While I'm averse to many big studio things, and more than a few franchises, and comic book vigilantes, and well...lots of things, Whedon helming a big budget franchise can lead to nothing but good things.  Not so much that The Avengers was the best thing in the world (even though it's fair to say that without the wit, humor, humanity and genre-bashing skillery of Mr. Whedon, it would have likely been the blueprint cog that many of the proceeding films felt like), but it because now as the director of one of the biggest movies ever, it gets a free ride for a bit...

...and that can be only good.  For only a man of his quirks and endless imagination would film a black and white modern version of Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing in the midst of an Avengers break.  God bless him, and let's all hope that his Marvel duties don't impede on him too much.  The film opens this June after receiving kind words from the Toronto Film Festival last year and SXSW last month.  Here's the trailer...spot out all the past Whedon alums.


Friday, April 5, 2013

Roger Ebert

A sad day for the film community as we have lost one of our own.  Roger Ebert passed away at the age of 70 due to a long struggle with cancer.  It's a hard blow for a man who devoted his entire life to the cinema.  He was not only a film critic, he was in very essence, "the film critic."  One of the last of the very few influential writers and proponents of the cinema.  Ebert starting writing for the Chicago Sun-Times in 1967 and was one of the few whose opinions really mattered in the sense that a film could be made by endorsement.  Introduced at a time in film culture where something like that really mattered and was treasured, not unlike Pauline Kael, Andrew Sarris or his late partner/rival Gene Siskel.  Through his PBS show Sneak Previews and later the syndicated At the Movies with Gene Siskel & Roger Ebert, he was part of great duo that championed cinema.  I remember watching Siskel & Ebert as a budding cineast myself every Sunday evening (my own personal church.)  This is one of the few shows that held an actual conversation about film, free of celebrity interviews or naval-gazing.  It was simple and delightful.  One of Ebert's greatest and most lasting recognitions to the film community was that by watching and writing and talking about all movies, he may ways became one of "the" cultural tastemakers.

Quite simply, with his endorsement, he could put a film on the map, especially the smaller movies that needed the most help.  To think that it's utterly possible that big sweeps of the country may never had heard, much less desired to watch movies like Hoop Dreams or My Dinner with Andre without watching Siskel and Ebert give them equal time with the big studio offerings on their show.  Their patented two thumbs up was a lark, and a soundbite, but also brilliant.  But the show itself was far more thoughtful and conversationalist than anything else-- it was a discussion about movies by people in utter awe of them.  My favorites were always when the critics cited their best and worst of the year, and the annual pre-Oscar tradition when they picked the winners.  Ebert's writing also had that rarefied ability, as it read as a discussion and dissection, at once articulate, funny and friendly.   Which only hints at his actual power.

In late 2003, he famously extolled Charlize Theron's performance in the film Monster as "one of the greatest performances in the history of the cinema."  Ebert didn't write or say this for hope of ad-time blurbs or mere hyperbole; he simply thought so.  It was one of the many cases where his imprint, his seal of approval, his thumb up changed the course of a movie.  The independent film may have become a financial success and Academy Award winner without it, but his fervor and devotion meant something.  It meant something more because Ebert's opinion was the one that mattered.  A few years later, Ebert championed the film Crash (2005), naming it his favorite film of that year.  While the film had a relatively sparse pre-Oscars awards haul and the film, while a hit when released in May, had received mixed reviews.  To think his endorsement didn't help the film edge on to become the surprise Best Picture winner that year is slightly foolish.  He championed the film because he was moved to by his response to it.  The point hardly matters how often or not one might have agreed with his analysis, but rests in that his continual commitment to the film community at large.  Through his film reviews, television shows, best-selling books, film festival and continued love for the medium, the Pulitzer Prize winner was a voice of reason and the cinemas biggest supporter.

It feels like the end of an era now.  There's no more Kael, or Sarris, or Siskel and now, sadly Ebert has passed on.  It was only a few days ago that Ebert took a leave of absence, a testament that even though he was battling illness for several years, he continued to watch and write and his thoughts still did matter.  Of course, there's many bright and talented writers of film currently working, but none of them will likely ever have to hold a candle in the public eye like Ebert.  The nature of the game has changed, and the advancement of technology has rendered the ability for anyone to be a film critic (no, the irony is not lost on me.)  We're in an age where a movie can sink or swim by opening night praises or catcalls on Facebook and Twitter.  In that regard, it's a shame that we may never have a tastemaker with the demeanor or intelligence of Roger Ebert ever again.  It's a greater shame that we don't have Roger Ebert anymore.

The balcony is closed.

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

2013: First Quarter

Time flies quickly.  We're already a quarter into 2013 and it feels like it just begun.  While the first couple of months of the cinematic year are clearly focused by the craziness and nonsense of the awards mania, movies did in fact come out.  While typically a dumping ground for inferior product and whatsits, I thought I'd pontificate.


Here's the "best" of the new year in terms of popularity, which means dollars and cents:
  1. Oz: The Great & Powerful- $200.2
  2. Identity Thief- $130.0
  3. The Croods- $93.8
  4. Mama- $71.5
  5. Safe Heaven- $69.8
  6. A Good Day to Die Hard- $66.5
  7. Warm Bodies- $65.2
  8. Jack the Giant Slayer- $61.5
  9. Olympus Has Fallen- $56.5
  10. G.I. Joe: Retaliation- $55.5
How about that?  The narrative this year so far has been focused on the downward stats on attendance and dollars earned.  A nod I have a particular distaste for as money should have nothing to do with the overall conversation of cinema.  That being said, 2013 thus far has been a waiting game for all.  Waiting, not just for a film to spark and engulf us into the joys of filmmaking, but also for the next big thing-- Oz: The So-So and Kinda Sexist changed the latter, to the mercy of executives and shareholders around the world...God bless!  Just to purge, the international box office paints a different picture; here's the top ten worldwide moneymakers of the 2013 so far:


  1. Oz: The Great & Powerful- $414.2
  2. A Good Day to Die Hard- $295.6
  3. The Croods- $242.7
  4. Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters- $216.4
  5. Jack the Giant Slayer- $158.0
  6. Identity Thief- $146.7
  7. G.I. Joe: Retaliation- $135.9
  8. Mama- $127.0
  9. Warm Bodies- $104.5
  10. Gangster Squad- $99.2
Eight out of ten films overlap, but perceives failures Jack the Giant Slayer, Gangster Squad and A Good Day to Die Hard don't quite seem quite that overall.  Meanwhile, the Hansel & Gretel sequel is a real thing now, so thank you international audiences for that.


The top ten per-screen averages of 2013:
  1. Spring Breakers- $87,667
  2. The Place Beyond the Pines- $69,864
  3. Somebody Up There Likes Me- $34,362
  4. From Up on Poppy Hill- $28,793
  5. Quartet- $23,561
  6. Stoker- $22,935
  7. 56 Up- %22,088
  8. Gimme the Loot- $21,065
  9. The Gatekeepers- $20,517
  10. Oz: The Great & Powerful- $20,223
Moral of the story is that 2013 has been James Franco's world; the rest of us are just living in it.

Enough with the numbers game!  It's about the quality dammit. And while 2013 has been so far, as previously mentioned, a few months of the waiting game, there have been a few things to pay attention too.  Here's my take:


Honorable mentions:  Stoker and The Place Beyond the Pines aren't quite films that work for me as a whole, but they are worthy auteural installments of the collections of their filmmakers,  Chan-wook Park and Derek Cianfrance.  Both have lovely visual touches and are worthy argumentative pieces of film.  Also of note are two films that had blink and you miss them 2012 Oscar qualifying releases that were shafted aside into early spring 2013 by tentative indie studios clearly mismanaging their properties-- On the Road and Ginger & Rosa.  Again neither film is perfect, but both have indelible performances worthy of discussion and foaming at the mouth.  On the Road features a hopefully star-making turn by Garrett Hedlund and Ginger & Rosa has a worthy one for Elle Fanning.  Both of them deserve better-- casting directors take notice.  Warm Bodies, a surprise box office hit was a quiet charmer as well, even though it clearly follows the strident Twilight mold.

The real deals:


4) Beautiful Creatures- Speaking of a film that follows the strident Twilight formula, Beautiful Creatures reversed roles of teenage witch and mortal falling in love in a fried green tomato backdrop.  It shouldn't have worked and well, audiences didn't go for it, which in a way may be an outside complement for a film that's smarter, funnier and fresher than it really has any right to be.  Director Richard LaGravenese brought a literary sense to this tweener, but also had a top drawer cast in Alice Englart (also a find in Ginger & Rosa) and Alden Ehrenreich (both refreshing newcomers), and able support in Jeremy Irons, Viola Davis, Emmy Rossum, Eileen Atkins, Margo Martindale, and most wondrous of all, Emma Thompson.  The mix of tones and acting styles, a gentle mix of earnest and camp made this a delightful surprise.  Terribly marketed by an unsure Warner Bros. seemingly desperate to brand this as something it wasn't quite, it's worthy of a look and a cult when it comes out on Blue-Ray.  Review here.


3) Side Effects- Steven Soderbergh's alleged swan song from the cinema was a lean, nervy potboiler.  Perhaps a film that could have been done in his sleep, it matters not.  Review here.


2) No- The most artful film thus far of 2013 was actually a Foreign Language Oscar nominee this year, and dare I say it (shameful I'm aware), I feel it might actually be better the winner.  Review here.


1) Room 237- The most refreshing and entertaining celebration of film geekery, perhaps of all time.  The Shining was one messed up movie.  Review here.

OSCAR-Y?
Anything coming out so far have any awards potential?

Well, Oz: The So-So & Kinda Sexist will have an outside shot at effects awards, but the nature of the blockbuster contingent can be hard to predict as we're not quite sure what the rest of the year will hold.  Alice in Wonderland, Tim Burton's ugly revisionist tale did well with the Academy and Oz was clearly made in the same mold, so Production Design seems a near given, but who really knows.  Stoker and The Place Beyond the Pines will have its critical champions and are worthy perhaps of some plaudits, but since neither will likely be audience favorites nor money makers, the Oscars aren't probable.  Aside from that James Franco has an bonafide Indie Spirit nod in the making for Spring Breakers.  That's all folks.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Finding Dory: April Foolishness

Pixar Animation Studios, the once revered and most beloved American film studio around, is jumping the shark yet again.  Well maybe that's not fair, but on a personal note, I'm completely conflicted about the news blurb that Finding Dory will be coming to a theater near you sometime in November, 2015.  A sequel to 2003's Finding Nemo, which holds a dear place in my heart (it's one of the top five, or maybe four, or maybe three films they've ever made in my book.)  Pixar isn't a stranger to the sequel world, as no one can ever quite escape the lure of franchisicity (I know that's not a word, but I'm using it anyway), but the majesty of the Toy Story films are so good, it's almost easier to swallow the drivel that was Cars 2, the only film in Pixar's illustrious canon that so clearly and obviously came out of corporate greed.  Monsters University, a sequel to 2001's Monsters, Inc. enters cinemas this summer as well.

I'm eternally hopeful that this will be more of a Toy Story-type scenario than a Cars one, but I still have this feverish averse reaction to meddling with gold.  The delight of Finding Nemo was its heart, it's sweetness, it's buoyancy.  Most of that came in the supporting character of Dory, delightfully and magnetically voiced by Ellen DeGeneres in a performance that should have earned an Oscar nomination, regardless of convention or snobbery.  Dory was the perfect supporting character, however, which feels like it might stymie this project.  It was a nearly indispensable character that I liken to those of which Thelma Ritter played in the fifties.

The Place Beyond the Pines

There's a lot of brooding in The Place Beyond the Pines, Derek Cianfrance's follow-up to his acclaimed 2010 film Blue Valentine.  There's much more than brooding however, as the angst-ridden, alpha-male melodrama unwinds and twists and turns.  There's a sense from the very beginning that Cianfrance's scope is large and looming, that there's a stake for the mythic in the somber staging of a film about fathers and sons and cops and robbers.  That sense starts at the opening shot.  It's of a ripped tatted torso belonging to star and Blue Valentine alum Ryan Gosling, himself no stranger to mythic archetypes of damaged anti-heroic men (or of showing off his physique, which at this point must surely be insured for a handsome sum.)  The camera moves out and the establishing shot and nearly bravura opening sequence showcases Gosling nearly already as something of a legend.  Cianfrance employs an artful, if a tad indulgent, opening tracking shot that follows Gosling-- here playing a mythic figure in his own right as a carnival stunt motorcycle driver with the moniker Handsome Luke-- as he enters the whirly motorcycle cage with two other stunt drivers.  And off he goes, spinning in circles, entrapped in a steely prism of danger and dread with the mere glint of exhilaration at its ridge, not unlike the movie that surrounds him. 

The openings speaks volumes for the film itself and also about its filmmaker-- it's hard for to severely judge a film with such ambition, and a certain nobility that comes along with it, but the film as a whole unfortunately can't quite measure up to the sum of its parts and that reckless ambition swerves The Place Beyond the Pines into heady, heavy-handed and downright cold terrain.  Whether sculpted by the cinematic ego of its helmer or not, the film becomes unwieldy as it chugs along its nearly two and a half hour running time.  Perhaps he bought a little much into the praise he received for Blue Valentine, a not completely dissimilar tonal companion piece, one that infolding as the degeneration of a marriage that often felt like, "the degeneration of a marriage."  The difference was that there was a spark and jolt of spontaneous electricity that ignited throughout the flash-forward/flash-back narrative.  It felt as though it was an invitation, a fly on the wall tracking of a pure love gone rotten.  The Place Beyond the Pines (its title derived from what the Iroquois tribe referred to as Schenectady, New York, where the film is set) is at once stubbornly straight-forward, but also hard and cold in its exactness.

But first the good news.  The opening is nearly intoxicating as it converges both Gosling the movie star and grand actor in a singularly absorbing way.  Outfitted with bleach blonde hair and cut-off Metalica shirts, his Luke is a lost boy relic of the sorts James Dean and Marlon Brando played generations ago.  The brooding glint of his stare registers pain, toughness, but also an approachable innocence.  Not unlike what he contributed to Drive a mere two years back, Gosling inhabits a place in the cinematic perception of masculinity, one that's more penetrating the less we know about his circumstance.  A vagabond joy rider who seeks his thrills trapped in his cage of doom, he's nonetheless a believable romantic.  Early on, he reconnects with Romina (Eva Mendes), a past conquest who informs Luke that the last time he came in town produced a baby boy, now a year old.  Conflicted as to what to do, as to whether stick around and try to provide for his son and his mother, or hit the road as per usual, Luke broods.

He finds lodging and a friend of sorts in a slimy mechanic played by Ben Mendelsohn (excellent) and nearly immediately segues into a partnership of robbing banks.  The jagged genre push elevates The Place Beyond the Pines from somber into to something else entirely, but it's hinged on the half-baked idea that Luke, a intriguing man who may not exactly be the brightest, honestly believes his thrust into crime is for the best.  However, there's an absorbing feeling, coupled with Gosling masterly portrayal, that this mere setup will pay off in rich dividends emotionally.  Sadly, that's where the bigger than it needs to be sense of pretension gets the better of Cianfrance, who wrote the screenplay with Ben Coccio and Darius Marder.

Suddenly just over an hour into the enterprise, The Place Beyond the Pines shifts gears to Bradley Cooper, a boy scout cop who is elevated into hero status in one of the biggest circuitous twists in store.  As jarring as the newly instated double header seems at first, the second chapter of the film, while failing to be quite as utterly absorbing or as thrilling as its beginning, still has its rewards, mostly because Cooper, who broods nearly as much as Gosling is in top form, but also because there's a slightly nifty counterpoint to his character's supposed nobility that matched with an ambition and headiness of its own.  He plays Avery Cross, a family man with a one year old son as well...remember that bit, nothing in The Place Beyond the Pines is unintentional.  Cross becomes embroiled in a scandal of sorts with some pretty shifty cops-- Ray Liotta plays the shiftiest, who reads as trouble from his first appearance.  It almost feels like Cianfrance is riffing on Julius Caesar or something as Cross, whose father is a former politico, and his moral compass become tampered by his new found reputation, guile and greed.

Just as his story appears to be unwinding, The Place Beyond the Pines decides its not quite over yet as the screen fades out and a title card reads, "15 YEARS LATER."  There was audible shrieks and jostling in seats at this moment, and it appears that the full circle triptych of Cianfrance's labor was to conclude, most jarringly, with the now teenage children of Luke and Avery.  Played by Dale DeHaan (Lawless,Chronicle) and Emory Cohen (notable for his "colorfully critiqued" character as Debra Messing's son on the TV show Smash) play Jason and AJ, who are bonded more so by the forces of nature than by mere coincidental high school experiences.  It's shame and more than a bit of over-the-top bombastic one at that the Cianfrance chooses to conclude his meticulous "mythic" tale in such a decidedly thump like fashion.  It's not quite the fault of the actors (if nothing else, Cianfrance proves his gift of bringing out the best and most natural in his performers), but the heavy-handed direction of a tale that not quite as big and mighty as the filmmakers may assume it to be.  C
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...