It isn't easy being green, especially in such a hollow, CGI'd fashion, devoid of personality. So goes the joyless affair that is The Green Lantern, a paint-by-numbers comic book adaptation that appears less interested in itself than the sleepy audience watching. Even with the loud-as-can-be sound mixing, the snores might drown it out. Directed by Martin Campbell, a typically far more sturdy conductor of popcorn fare (The Mask of Zorro, GoldenEye, Casino Royale, all proficiently made if not quite artful) puts a polished sheen over the DC Comics hero, but it never soars, it stays stubbornly earthbound, and seemingly derivative of a million sub-par properties before it. And while it may not be fair, especially coming from myself, a guy who has a grown-up appreciation, if not zealot fanboy lust for comic book superheroes, and as one who has never picked up an edition of The Green Lantern in his life, I ask the question: Is this guy supposed to be soooo lame? With a mythology less synonymous in pop-culture than say Batman, or Superman, or even the X-Men, I, admittedly have little to back this up with, and while it may not be fair to expect more from the less doted on of masked men, this film is my first encounter, and perhaps also my swan song, I started rolling my eyes from the first bit of narration and shifting in my sit within the first reel. A few years ago, a decent film was made up of Iron Man, a less-than culturally heralded of comic book hero, last year a decidedly different fate took from with a another hero in Jonah Hex; Green Lantern (aka Hal Jordan) falls somewhere in the middle, embracing its generic, if watchable mediocrity.
The exposition is pretty easy to settle with, and it's repeated a lot, so one never has to worry if they've missed it. First it's explained to us, than to it's soon-to-be hero, than our hero's social circle, and recapped at the end...napping will not interfere with the plot, in fact it might be encouraged. You see, there's this intergalactic police force of sorts known as the Green Lantern Corps; they oversee everything and there's a representative from each sector of the universe, who with a nifty ring, and by sure will govern the galaxy. This ring chooses who the Green Lantern will be; one of those suspension of disbelief gags that you either accept or not. The "one" (oops wrong movie) this time is Hal Jordan (Ryan Reynolds), a playboy pilot with an only-in-the-movies devil may care stride, whose physique belies charm or any sort of development. He also has pretty messed up daddy issues, played up for false emotional cues. He's got a lady friend, as he must, played with Gossip Girl-frigidity by Blake Lively, there to reprimand his irresponsibility and wait idly for when the script decides it's time for them to kiss. He's the first human to join the ranks of the Lanterns, so Jordan, who spent the first quarter of the film as a Top Gun-tool must be worth it if the ring says so.
We get some backstory to Lanterns, led by all knowing group of elder types, reminiscent of Yoda, and a nondescript alien dude named Sinestro, played by British actor Mark Strong (the go to guy for big-budget intensity (of Robin Hood, Stardust and Kick-Ass fame) who speaks in similar vocal rhythms to that of Laurence Fishburne's Morpheus in the Matrix movies; every syllable is pointed and succinct; a speech therapist might be proud. Their planet, all good and ruled by the will of the universe, which in turns powers the rings of the chosen ones, is a mist of green shrouding a grungy and dark (quite dark if you journey to this exercise in 3-D) land. Visually reminiscent of everything from Tron, to The Flash, to last months Thor, there's a sense of a mechanical aesthetic behind The Green Lantern, which features plentiful special effects, many in which are fairly impressive, but it all adds up to "so what." In moments where artificial magic seems a given, like Hal's first flight, or his training exercises showcasing the green-y splendor the ring's power, there's such a rushed, get-to-it sensation of the franchise machine at work, there's precious little time to dwell on mythic charms. And while logic has no place here, it does seem curious that such an amateur at intergalactic hero work takes to it so quickly.
Rushed screentime is also parted to the villian; there's two in The Green Lantern. The first a nebbish scientist type amusingly played by Peter Sarsgaard, who tops Hal Jordan's father issues with increasing mania. Then there's an alien (or whatever) baddie named Parallex, a black blob composed of energy that's built on fear; one has the sense if they really capitalized on the cheesy potential here, this might be a fun, if mindlessly stupid enterprise. But franchise movie-making is a serious venture, and all involved, including CGI villains must look steadfast in their professionalism. Since character study, visual wonderment, or a perfunctory story take a back seat, there's enough time arch speeches of the power of will over fear (those two words in particular likely make up half the dialogue, credited to four screenwriters) and for veteran actors like Tim Robbins and Angela Bassett to stop by and collect paychecks; Bassett in particular distracts in a few brief scenes if only to agitate with memories of the few golden years in the early 90s when she seared the screen.
The silliest thing about The Green Lantern is that even with a premise made up entire of sci\fi hokum, there could still have a been a fun ride here. Reynolds has a blank, sullen stare half the time, but is game enough, especially in the action sequences, and with a lighter approach it might have worked...Iron Man, for example, wasn't written off for having a sense of humor. Instead, with its graver production, and perhaps graver movie-going environment, we're stuck with a joyless, flightless, altogether sodden superhero. C-
Showing posts with label THE GREEN LANTERN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label THE GREEN LANTERN. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Monday, June 20, 2011
Weekend Box Office
Am I alone in thinking that the summer movie season, a mere six weeks in, already feels kind of over. Sure there's blockbusters on the horizon...Transformers: Dark of the Moon, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II are a coming complete with retrofitted 3-D. And Captain America will continue the ongoing Avengers advertisement, and who knows, maybe original properties like Cowboys & Aliens and Crazy Stupid Love will surprise. But, by and large, it feels kind of over for Hollywood. The dearth and blah comes with the top selling item this week:
![]() |
| Bad vs. Good |
- The Green Lantern- Middling reviews, a terrible trailer, and misgivings over the profitability of any DC character other than Batman or Superman couldn't stop the Ryan Reynolds-magical ring comic from top the chart with a respectable (if earthbound) take of $52 million. I love Manohla Dargis New York Times review, which sufficiently states..."The Green Lantern is bad," literary cred isn't always necessary. Next weekend, and how it holds up will tell us how quickly the film fades.
- Super 8- Last weekend's champ, and the first Hollywood studio flick this year to work, in my opinion, but that's hardly a contest this year fell 40% in it's second weekend with $72 million overall. Considering the film only cost $50 million to make, Paramount should be pleased...however audiences should be flocking to this joyously nostalgic picture. A 33% increase in sales from Friday to Saturday is encouraging...by contrast The Green Lantern, in it's first weekend, fell 22% from opening day to Saturday. Fanboys aren't the only audiences!!!!
- Mr. Popper's Penguins- Is it just me or doesn't the title sound a bit dirty. I kid, this family picture adapted from the 1930s children stories (loosely adapted) made a ho-hum $18 million opening weekend. Jim Carrey can still kind of open a picture, but one must assume had this opened in the late 90s, this would be a blockbuster.
- X-Men: First Class- In it's third weekend, the last incarnation of our favorite mutant superheros has amassed $119 million. One has to think if 20th Century Fox isn't kicking themselves for not reformatting the flick to 3-D. Of course that would be a huge mistake; I prefer a clear picture of Michael Fassbender.
- The Hangover: Part Two- Currently the highest grossing film of 2011, Todd Phillips frat-house frenzy dropped 45% in it's fourth weekend. Total cume is $232 million.
- Kung Fu Panda 2- If disappointing that it hasn't out-grossed the original, this second outing with the martial artist panda has made $143 million in four weeks.
- Bridemaids- In what can truly be described as the sleeper of the year, Kristen Wiig's comedy in it's sixth weekend dropped a scant 25% and has earned $136 million to date. Many in the industry might see it as a feminist bellwether...the greater truth might just be that the film is funny.
- Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides- 2011's one billionth unnecessary sequel that squanders the good will and small virtues of the original has amassed $220 million in five weeks. Yes, it's the weakest seller in the quad, and weakest on terms of attendance, but $200 million is ridiculous. I miss Johnny Depp playing characters...free him!
- Midnight in Paris- A surprise and wonder, Woody Allen's latest has earned $21 million in five weeks. To put into perspective, this is Allen's sixth highest grossing film (not adjusted for inflation) in his forty year career, and the widest release of any Allen film to date (it's currently playing on 1,038 screens.) While always prolific, his films have never been huge money makers, even back in his heyday. So the response to Midnight in Paris is staggering. The question now is, since the movie is holding so beautifully, is to whether it will garner awards traction; and since the Academy is going into reactive, bad-shit crazy mode, could it stand a chance?
- Judy Moody and the Not So Bummer Summer- The tweener has earned $11 million in two weeks.
- Thor- In it's seventh week, and all but forgotten, the mighty hammer man has fallen out of the top ten, soon to be hitting DVD shelves, with a nearly final total of $176 million.
- The Tree of Life- Four weeks in, Terrence Malick's divisive tale of "it all" has earned nearly $4 million on 114 screens. Fox Searchlight still appears tentative about releasing with wide (and that's fairly understandable for those who've seen it), but one wonders, when it happens, will the film have totally fallen out of the cinematic conversation. Awards consideration is a mo point...how does one sell this one outside a major city?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

